Flutter vs React Native: Duel of the Cross-Platform Titans


In recent years, the debate between Flutter and React Native has heated up in the mobile development community. Both frameworks are widely used for developing cross-platform applications, each offering unique features, benefits, and challenges. This article provides a comprehensive comparison of these two popular technologies, to help you understand and decide which one suits your needs best.

With the expansion of mobile user base worldwide and the impending creation of over 3 billion applications, cost-effective solutions are becoming a necessity. Many firms embarking on mobile app development journey face the challenge of opting for React Native or Flutter.

Both these frameworks command a considerable following among developers, with React Native attracting 38% of the community and Flutter grabbing a 42% share. The ultimate selection often hinges on the precise requirements, strategic aims, and technical nuances inherent in the cross-platform application development process.

Flutter vs React Native: Overview

Flutter, a product of Google, was released in December 2018. It's written in Dart and provides a unified approach to app development, reducing costs and complexity. In contrast, Facebook's React Native, released in March 2015, uses JavaScript and extends its capabilities with TypeScript, making it accessible to a large community of web developers.

Furthermore, both frameworks serve as a powerful tool for creating high-performance, visually appealing applications across multiple platforms. However, the choice between them often boils down to the specific requirements of the project, the skill set of the development team, and the expected performance and user experience of the application.

Source: flutterbyexample.com

Meaning for App Developers, Designers, and Businesses

Flutter aims to simplify app development by providing a unified codebase for different platforms. It boasts of a rapidly growing developer base and has strong support from Google, which constantly provides updated information and detailed guides. Designers appreciate Flutter's capacity to translate ideas into working code without the limitations of conventional frameworks, while CTOs and businesses value its capability to accelerate feature development.

On the other hand, React Native is loved by web developers who can easily transition to mobile development due to its similarity to React. Designers find React Native flexible, offering robust support for animations. For businesses, React Native's ability to maintain a single codebase for iOS and Android development is a significant time-saver, especially if they already have a web app written in React.

Native UI support & UI Consistency

Both platforms handle native UI differently. React Native provides an optimized UI for each platform out of the box, while Flutter requires additional coding to provide platform-specific interfaces. However, Flutter offers UI consistency across all platforms and OS versions out of the box, whereas React Native requires additional work or tools for consistent UI across different OS versions.

Development Time & Time-to-Market

Development time is highly dependent on design requirements. Flutter is faster for creating applications with consistent design across platforms. But it could take longer if designs differ between Android and iOS. For React Native, it's the opposite. Thanks to JavaScript, developers can work with any IDE or text editor, possibly accelerating development if designs vary for different mobile app versions.

In terms of time-to-market, both are fairly fast. However, thanks to its library of prebuilt UI components, Flutter might edge out React Native slightly.


When considering mobile application development, performance is often a paramount concern. Both Flutter and React Native deliver respectable performance, but there are certain distinctions to bear in mind. Flutter is compiled directly into native code, eliminating any performance bugs of the interpretation process. This direct compilation provides an edge, especially when it comes to complex animations and transitions, giving a smooth, lag-free experience to users.

On the other hand, React Native partially relies on JavaScript, which is interpreted at runtime, causing a slight decline in performance. While React Native does indeed offer near-native performance, it's not as efficient as Flutter in handling graphic-rich applications or during CPU-intensive tasks. Nonetheless, for most applications, this difference is hardly noticeable. It's worth noting that the choice between Flutter and React Native should also factor in the app's specific needs, such as the complexity of UI, expected user load, and desired response times.

Flutter and React Native communication channels and community size comparison for February 2023.

Learning Ability, Available Platforms, Maintenance, and Documentation

Learning Flutter may be a bit tricky for newcomers due to the Dart language. However, those with experience in Java, Swift, Kotlin or C# might find it easier. On the contrary, React Native, based on JavaScript, is easy to pick up especially by those experienced with JavaScript or React web.

Flutter supports Android, iOS, Windows, Linux, MacOS, Web out of the box. React Native primarily supports Android and iOS, but with additional tools, it can also support the Web and Windows.

Both platforms differ significantly in terms of maintenance. Flutter makes it easy to update to new versions thanks to its built-in tools, while version updates on React Native are more complex and might require additional effort.

Regarding documentation, while Flutter’s documentation is well-prepared and organized, React Native's documentation is considered more user-friendly by many developers, including best practices and FAQs.

Understanding the Learning Path: Flutter Versus React Native

The learning curve disparity between Flutter and React Native is an aspect worth considering when selecting an appropriate framework. If your team already has expertise in one of these technologies, transitioning to the other could incur additional costs.

Now, which of these is simpler to learn? Some might argue that React Native, being based on JavaScript, is more accessible for developers acquainted with that language and its well-established community offers a wealth of resources for learning.

React Native provides a familiar landscape to developers well-versed in JavaScript, mirroring the architecture of web development. However, it can be slightly more daunting for newcomers to mobile app development, as it demands a more profound grasp of mobile-centric concepts like native components and platform APIs.

This isn't to say that Flutter presents a substantial learning hurdle. Although Flutter leverages Dart—a less popular language compared to JavaScript—it isn't overly challenging for developers to pick up. Google further facilitates this with a broad array of free Flutter tutorials and resources.

Prominent Applications Developed Using Flutter

Flutter has been adopted by various industries, and several notable applications have been built using this framework. Here are five such examples:

  • Google Ads: Google's own advertisement service app utilizes Flutter. It provides users with a convenient way to view ad performance statistics on their smartphones.
  • Alibaba: The international trade and commerce giant, Alibaba, uses Flutter for parts of their app to deliver a seamless user experience to their vast customer base.
  • Reflectly: This AI-powered journal app uses Flutter to offer a beautiful and intuitive user interface. Flutter's rich set of features helps the app assist users in dealing with negative thoughts and increasing positivity.
  • Groupon: Known for providing top-notch deals and discounts, Groupon turned to Flutter for their merchant application, to improve performance and consistency across platforms.
  • The New York Times: The renowned newspaper has developed a puzzle game using Flutter. This has enabled smooth, cross-platform functionality that keeps users engaged.

High-Profile Applications Developed Using React Native

React Native has seen widespread adoption across various sectors, powering numerous high-profile applications. Here are five such examples:

  • Facebook: As the originator of React Native, Facebook uses this framework extensively in its main app, particularly for the Ads Manager feature.
  • Instagram: Instagram, owned by Facebook, implemented React Native to add some new features, accelerating the development process while maintaining the native look and feel.
  • UberEats: The popular food delivery application, UberEats, employs React Native in their restaurant dashboard for its efficiency and cross-platform capabilities.
  • Skype: Microsoft adopted React Native for rebuilding their Skype app. This allowed for the development of a more robust and faster application with improved features.
  • Walmart: In pursuit of improving customer experience and performance, Walmart integrated React Native into their mobile app. This resulted in smoother animations and faster load times, elevating the overall user experience.

Most used engines by mobile app and games developers worldwide (July 2022).
Source: Statista

Summing Up the Discussion on Flutter vs React Native

In conclusion, both Flutter and React Native have their unique strengths and are well-suited for different types of projects. Flutter, with its direct native compilation and rich set of UI components, offers superior performance and design consistency across multiple platforms. Its growing popularity and strong backing from Google make it an attractive choice for many developers. React Native, on the other hand, leverages the widely-used JavaScript language, making it more accessible to a large pool of developers. Its strong community support, flexibility in design, and integration with native components make it a powerful tool for mobile app development. Ultimately, the choice between Flutter and React Native will depend on your project's specific needs, the skills of your development team, and your long-term development goals. Both frameworks are excellent choices for cross-platform mobile app development and are continuously evolving to meet the demands of modern app development.

We use cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.

Privacy Policy